How is correcting fake info a hostile comment Piano recorded in studio from errmmm a real piano that part was not composed in reason small facts such as that are fake declarations of the 100% claim. Ie enochs total fake news like plug 100% composed in reason is actually not correct. It is called telling the truth and being factual.

Stating honest facts is not a hostile thing at all. And before anyone says it, I'm waiting for tracks to render. It doesn't invalidate the program used to create the music in the first place.īut yeah, jesus. it's very common for a song to start in one program, before being passed around to a producer (or two or three or four) before finally landing in the lap of an engineer using yet another piece of software. If you watch any Q&A sessions with top mixing engineers for the biggest names in Pop, Hip Hop, etc. People are bound to share what they consider good examples of music made in software they enjoy using, and personally as someone quite heavily invested in the platform I'm glad to see a few more high profile people using Reason m'self. Īnd yours comes from where ? Ya arse end ?ĭude why are you so hostile? Seriously. Your arguments have no wieght mine is filled by proof in the video. Mastering different thing to mixing and manipulating the sounds to get the right sound ehhh ?.Īny more non sense plugs anywhere from you lot. Guy states in video mixed in other daw to get the right sound.

Who gives a rat's ass if it was mastered in Pro Tools? The point is, people who claim Reason isn't a legitimate tool for composing music are being disingenuous. A song that is composed 100% in Reason hits #10 on the Top 40 charts in the US (and various other spots throughout the world), and still - it's not enough for some people.

Down by marian hill on the piano